Senate Committee Passes Safe Chemicals Act, But Don’t Get Too Excited Yet

by , 07/26/12

antibacterial soap, antibiotics, bpa, chemical exposure, chemical reform, FDA, fda antibiotic use, fda fails,government fails, government mistakes, government policy,how to change laws, overuse of antibacterials, phthalates, pink slime, polluting the food supply, poor government, school budget cuts, school funding cuts, super germs, toxic body care, toxic personal care products, toxic schools, us food supply, us governement, us government, us government fails, chemical reform, safe chemicals act, chemical act, lobby for change

Yesterday (July 25) a key Senate committee approved the very first overhaul of federal chemicals regulation in 36 years. The last time any major chemical regulations were passed was way back when most of us were in diapers. with the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), so the passing of the Safe Chemicals Act is big news indeed. Most consider TSCA an incredibly weak U.S. environmental law and for years, a teams of organizations, government officials and concerned parents, among others, have been working hard to pass new laws that will better protect families from harmful chemicals. Now, this work has somewhat paid off. Andy Igrejas, Campaign Director for Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families says, “Today’s vote is a victory for American families dealing with many health problems, like childhood cancer, linked to unregulated chemicals.” I wouldn’t get too excited yet though. While most are relishing this “victory,” it’s not time to stop fighting yet. We have a long uphill battle ahead of us before chemical reform becomes a reality, especially as this legislation attempts to move to the Senate floor.

antibacterial soap, antibiotics, bpa, chemical exposure, chemical reform, FDA, fda antibiotic use, fda fails,government fails, government mistakes, government policy,how to change laws, overuse of antibacterials, phthalates, pink slime, polluting the food supply, poor government, school budget cuts, school funding cuts, super germs, toxic body care, toxic personal care products, toxic schools, us food supply, us governement, us government, us government fails, chemical reform, safe chemicals act, chemical act, lobby for change

Image by datarec via sxc.

What this vote means for your family

The Safe Chemicals Act was introduced in April, 2011, sponsored by Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg’s (D-New Jersey). The point of the Act is to update and strengthen an insanely flawed American industry and government system that fails to protect you, your family and the environment from toxic chemicals in consumer products. This vote means that a Senate committee has decided to take measures that will hopefully, “Shift how toxic chemicals are tested, approved and used in the marketplace,” says Heather White, EWG’s chief of staff and general counsel. Lautenberg bill is meant to create legislation that will force chemical companies to prove that their products are safe for human health and the environment, before selling said products on the market. White goes on to explain, “Tens of thousands of manmade chemicals are used into every conceivable consumer product without adequate safety testing. If the Lautenberg legislation becomes law, that wild west approach to chemicals management, which has long put human health and the environment at risk, might finally come to an end.” It’s not all about consumers either. The Act takes the chemical industry into account as well. Scott Faber, EWG’s vice-president for government affairs, points out that while many in the chemical industry aren’t thrilled with chemical reform, the bill does included provisions meant to help protect manufacturers’ ability to protect their proprietary trade secrets.

To sum up, we need better chemical laws so when you go shopping the choice of which product is safe (or not) won’t be such a problem. This Act helps accomplish this. Imagine going to the store and being able to buy cosmetics, baby shampoo and cleaning products without having to worry so much about chemicals. It would rock right?

Pages: 1 2

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.

Add your comments

NEW USER

CURRENT USERS LOGIN

Lost your password?

Let's make sure you're a real person: