Doctors Petition USDA to Remove Milk from School Lunches

milk, cows milk, obesity, overweight kids, childhood obesity, bone strength, healthy bones, healthy teeth, childhood nutrients, school lunch program, school lunch milk, school milk, soy milk, calcium, healthy school lunch, usda lunches, usda school lunch

On July 19, the nonprofit Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM), filed a petition (pdf) asking the USDA to remove milk as a required food from the national school lunch program. The PCRM petition argues that milk should not be included as part of a healthy school lunch for the following reasons:

  • There’s limited proof that milk improves bone health or reduces the risk of osteoporosis.
  • Dairy foods may create other health risks.
  • Milk does not prevent bone fractures and injury in children and adults.
  • Cows milk is the number one source of saturated fat in children’s diets.
  • One in eight Americans is lactose intolerant.
  • More than 1 million U.S. children struggle with milk allergies.

Furthermore, PCRM nutrition education director Susan Levin, M.S., R.D., points out that, “Focusing on milk as the single most important source of calcium in children’s diets distracts schools and parents from foods that can actually build bones, like beans and leafy greens.

Should milk be removed from school lunches?

  • 204 Votes Yes - milk is not a healthy drink for kids
  • 53 Votes No - milk is a healthy drink for kids
  • 237 Votes No, but I think there should be other drink options too
  • 11 Votes I'm not sure what I think

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
milk, cows milk, obesity, overweight kids, childhood obesity, bone strength, healthy bones, healthy teeth, childhood nutrients, school lunch program, school lunch milk, school milk, soy milk, calcium, healthy school lunch, usda lunches, usda school lunch

Image by Flickr User USDAgov

According to PCRM, the federal government spends more money on dairy than any other food item in the school lunch program. They also argue that the amount of calcium your body ultimately absorbs is based on various factors, such as genes, vitamin D intake, exercise and more, so maybe the real focus should be on an overall healthy lifestyle, not just making sure kids get that daily container of milk. PCRM points out that there are other ways for kids to get their daily calcium, such as from foods like beans, tofu, broccoli, kale, collard greens, cereals and other calcium-fortified beverages, including orange juice and soy milk.

That said, this issue is already creating some massive debates. First of, the national school lunch program isn’t exactly known for stellar quality. It’s taken literally 15 years for healthy school lunch changes to occur, and it’s super unlikely that we’ll see USDA sanctioned lunches packed full of tofu and kale anytime soon. On top of this, TIME Magazine talked with a dietician, along with other doctors who note that kids seem to “really like milk” and it may be irresponsible to remove milk from lunches considering it packs in plenty of other nutrients beyond calcium, such as vitamin A, protein, potassium, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin B12 and phosphorus. Getting back to the other side, schools don’t serve organic milk and while conventional milk may have nutrients, it’s also packed with hormones, chemicals and antibiotics, all major problems. On top of icky additives in milk, kids in this country are insanely overweight, and fatty dairy products may have something to do with it.

Still, it’s hard to blame dairy products alone for the 17% childhood obesity rate, especially when so many kids are indulging in poor food choices, huge portions and barely exercising. It’s in poor taste to blame milk alone for overweight kids when there are actually many factors at play. What do you think? Should plain old milk be removed from school lunches? Tell us what you think in the comments.

+ Doctors Petition USDA to Remove Milk as Required Food from School Lunches

+ Source

Lead image by Ale_Paiva via sxc.

Related Posts

2 Responses to “Doctors Petition USDA to Remove Milk from School Lunches”

  1. EH says:

    As I understand MILK actually, over a longtime (years/decades) can contribute to inhibiting calcium absorbtion and do just the opposite of what people want it to do -Casein derived from dairy is the same stuff used to make glue- Remember Elmer’s glue- the COW. It coast the intestinal wall slowly and insidiously. And with people’s poor diets, lack of fibre etc, and limited fasting, that intestinal “crust” only thickens. Things are compounded by eating of meat and other stuffs that are never properly evacuated or absorbed. Sadly, the public still buys into the milk is a good source of calcium story because of the power of the lobbies. On the outside the story looks good, but the real deal is a far different result.

  2. lphomiej says:

    The thing is… if kids didn’t have milk, they wouldn’t drink water. They’d drink soda or juice (both of which are sugary drinks). I think milk is the lesser of the evils here. I also believe milk is one of the few perfect foods people actually eat. It’s full of protein, calcium, and is generally low in fat.

Leave a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.

Add your comments

NEW USER

CURRENT USERS LOGIN

Lost your password?

Let's make sure you're a real person: