Breastfeeding Shown to Lower Obesity Rates in Extensive Irish Study

eat right, exercising with kids, fight obesity, fitness goals, get fit, get healthy, healthy kids, healthy parents, how to exercise, breastfeeding reduced obesity, breastfeed for healthy kids, breast milk, breastfeeding best, breast is best, obesity issues breastfeeding

In February 2011, First Lady Michelle Obama kicked off a campaign to promote breastfeeding, telling Politics Daily, “What we’re learning now is that early intervention is key. Kids who are breastfed longer have a lower tendency to be obese.” Many Republicans, conservatives and others didn’t like Michelle Obama’s move, declaring that breastfeeding is best left off the government table. Now researchers in Ireland have shown that Obama was on to something with a study that shows that breastfeeding for 13 to 25 weeks is associated with a 38% risk reduction for obesity for nine year-old kids, while breastfeeding longer than 26 weeks is linked to a full 51% reduction in risk of obesity. Numerous studies (pdf) over the last couple of decades have also shown that breastfeeding does reduce the risk for obesity significantly. This new study, published recently in the journal Social Science and Medicineis a bit different than studies of the past though, because it looked at a very large study group – 8,568 Irish children, or one-seventh of all the kids born in that nation between 1997 and 1998.

eat right, exercising with kids, fight obesity, fitness goals, get fit, get healthy, healthy kids, healthy parents, how to exercise, breastfeeding reduced obesity, breastfeed for healthy kids, breast milk, breastfeeding best, breast is best, obesity issues breastfeeding

The researchers in the Ireland study designed their study specifically to address any criticism past research on this topic has received. For example, this research took parent weight into account along with other conditions associated with childhood obesity, including low socioeconomic status and a lack of physical activity. Even taking all of the above into account, the new research still showed a strong link between breastfeeding and a lowered risk for obesity. The researchers estimate that breastfeeding may reduce obesity rates due to the healthy composition of human breast milk and because breastfeeding mothers, “May be more responsive to children’s cues indicating satiety.” However, researchers found that the obesity lowering benefits of breastfeeding don’t kick in unless mother’s breastfeed for at least 13 weeks, and the benefits increased significantly for children who breastfed for 26 weeks or more. This catch could be a problem, because as it has been well-documented, women in the USA don’t breastfeed nearly long enough. In fact many women have problems meeting even a 3 month exclusive breastfeeding goal, while a recent CDC USA breastfeeding report card shows that only 43% of U.S. babies are still breastfed at six months of age and just 22.4% of U.S. babies are still being breastfed at 12 months of age. Worse, not one state in the USA has reached a 50% breastfeeding rate at 12 months. If we want to work on the obesity problem in the USA, maybe we should start by supporting, not hindering mamas when it comes to breastfeeding.

+ Source

All images by Flickr User Mothering Touch

Related Posts

2 Responses to “Breastfeeding Shown to Lower Obesity Rates in Extensive Irish Study”

  1. ppp says:

    Then why is Michelle Obama allowing Nestle(Gerber) to sponsor city programs targeted at reducing childhood obesity? Nestle, the largest manufacturer of infant formula in the world, has NO VESTED INTEREST in anyone breastfeeding yet they will be teaching mothers how to “best feed” their babies and children. The White House and Surgeon General are well aware of these unethical partnerships and have done nothing to stop them!
    Notice the focus of Michelle Obama’s campaign has been shifted away from junk food and breastfeeding to exercise – this way she doesn’t offend big industry who paid $179 million in lobbying costs thus they are untouchable! Well, what does that tell you?
    Its not about saving money or better health. It’s about the making of money by big industry and poorer health. That means overweight, sick children who end up being overweight, sick adults! Thus the corporate wheel keeps grinding and we are stuck paying the price.

  2. Asouma says:

    Just thought I’d share this about froumla I don’t have children, but I do raise dairy goats. This involves removing the babies and bottlefeeding, for a variety of reasons health and behavioral. I’ve tried replacer (the livestock version of froumla) and if I feed more than 50% replacer at a time the kids ALWAYS get sick, with nasty runny bottoms, etc. Even pasteurized/homogenized cow’s milk works better, although I avoid even that. First choice is feeding raw goat’s milk, since they grow better (No illness + adequate nutrition), and well-grown kids win more blue ribbons. Second choice is frozen, year old goats milk if I have a supply and demand problem.So if my goats can’t even thrive on the stuff, why, pray tell, would I feed it to my much more valuable and longer lived human child?

Leave a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.

Add your comments

NEW USER

CURRENT USERS LOGIN

Lost your password?

Let's make sure you're a real person: